What Are Investors Accusing Fantasy.top Of?

Onchain trading card platform Fantasy.top is facing accusations from early angel investors who claim the project has stopped communicating and refuses to return small investment checks made during its early development phase. The allegations surfaced this week after several investors raised concerns publicly on social media.

An investor using the handle “varrock” wrote that the SocialFi platform has refused to return about $50,000 in angel investment and failed to provide promised updates. “[I] will never see it while they use the money they made to pay themselves salaries,” the investor wrote. “I’ve been promised a roadmap and financial statement, never got anything.”

Other crypto figures echoed the complaint. Ethos Network CEO Trevor Thompson, who posts online under the pseudonym “Serpin Taxt,” wrote: “+1, never once received comms from the team.” Thompson added that he personally did not expect repayment of his angel investment but confirmed that communication had been limited.

Some members of the crypto community described the situation as a “soft rugpull,” a term used when a project remains online but drifts away from earlier promises while early backers feel ignored or sidelined.

Investor Takeaway

The dispute shows how early-stage crypto projects can run into governance friction when informal angel rounds collide with evolving product strategies and limited disclosure standards.

Why Has the Dispute Drawn Attention?

The issue drew broader attention after prominent venture investor Mike Dudas publicly asked Fantasy.top’s leadership to address the claims. Dudas, managing partner and co-founder of early-stage venture firm 6th Man Ventures, wrote that he had also invested a small angel check in the project.

“What’s your plan? You cleared millions, you haven’t repaid your angels or communicated with them, have you any honor?” Dudas wrote in a public post addressed to Fantasy.top’s pseudonymous founder Travis Bickle.

The criticism gained traction because Fantasy.top was once one of the fastest-growing SocialFi experiments during the 2024 cycle. The platform allowed users to trade NFT-style cards representing crypto influencers, generating trading activity and protocol fees during its peak usage period.

At one point, the project climbed into the top 10 crypto protocols ranked by fees and revenue on DeFiLlama, appearing alongside popular platforms such as pump.fun during the height of its activity.

Has Fantasy.top Changed Direction?

Part of the tension surrounding the dispute comes from claims that the project has moved away from its original trading-card game model. Some investors now argue that the team has redirected attention toward prediction markets and other products under the broader Fantasy application.

The project previously raised $4.25 million in a seed funding round led by Dragonfly, with earlier support from Alliance DAO. The combination of venture backing and strong early revenue helped the game attract attention during the SocialFi boom.

Last November, the team said in a public update that the core trading-card game was not shutting down. However, recent comments from investors suggest that some backers feel the direction of the platform has become unclear or insufficiently communicated.

Investor Takeaway

In crypto startups, product pivots can trigger disputes when early investors believe the project’s strategy has diverged from the original pitch without clear reporting.

How Did Fantasy.top Respond?

Fantasy.top co-founder Travis Bickle addressed the criticism on Wednesday, saying there was “a lot of misinformation” circulating online about the company’s finances and operations.

“For the past 2 years, the company has been fully self-funded through product revenues,” Bickle wrote. “Revenues were reinvested into development across multiple products and systems built under the Fantasy app. No investor funds have been used for company operations during this time.”

According to Bickle, the company has more than 50 angel investors and is attempting to keep them informed while implementing internal changes.

“Over the past months, we’ve significantly reduced burn, streamlined the team, and reduced founders’ salaries,” he wrote. “The company has multiple years of runway without needing to touch investor funds.”

Bickle added that the team remains focused on building the business and plans to share more details about its next phase of development in the near future.

Author